I am wondering whether the x% of people companies reach through door to door marketing is worth the damage their image can suffer due to pushy and frankly crap sales people, and it's obvious opportunism. Now I assume that the recent increase of this I have experienced is due to measures to reduce that other incredibly annoying tactic - cold call telesales (in 2007, 14.8 Million numbers were registered exempt from cold calls). And, I guess one of the main reasons is that a company can be sure that they are reaching their target demographic directly, which much increase the percentage of success versus the effort they have to expend.
In the last couple of months I have been door stepped by a couple of people from N-Power and EDF, both selling me identical services that apparently "... are only available today, on this street!" (their emphasis). Services identical to my current British Gas offer too, by the way.
What really made me think about this though, was a visit from an Aviva salesman. Who's pitch for health insurance, was based around how bad the NHS is. Now this is an interesting departure. Never mind that I have absolutely no interest in talking about paying for my health on a cold Tuesday afternoon on my own doorstep, but to start your story by disparaging a competitor (which is what the NHS is) feels like a throwback to the pre-internet era. It feels incredibaly naive when you consider how available data and stories are today–and how much it could expose Aviva (or any other insurance provider) to extra scrutiny.
Their attack on the failings of the NHS was based on data - as along with our schools, it is now one of the most analysed institutions around. It seems an unfair fight when Aviva are not currently subject to the same scrutiny, and are not judged by the same metrics. It also of course, opens a political debate - and I'm not too sure that the barely 20 year old lad who was selling this policy would have been ready for a heated public/private debate, had he stumbled across someone up for that fight.
Anyway - I walked away with the impression of a company attempting to profit on the (necessarily public) failings of one of our public services, and asking me to disengage from my interest in the success of that service to invest in my own private wellbeing, and ultimately, make their shareholders some more money. That does not seem a good deal to me, and it's not a good reflection on them either...
harumph!
Posts
